Can steroids cause central serous retinopathy?
Central serous chorioretinopathy is a retinal disorder that has been linked to the systemic use of corticosteroids. Recently, it has also been reported after local administration of corticosteroids via inhaled and intranasal, epidural, intra-articular, topical dermal, and periocular routes.
How do you treat central serous chorioretinopathy?
Treatment and prognosis Several therapies have been used to treat chronic CSC, including thermal laser treatments, oral medications, and eye injections. A “cold laser,” called photodynamic therapy, is also effective and often used to focally treat the source of fluid leakage under the retina in chronic CSC.
How serious is central serous chorioretinopathy?
Central serous retinopathy does not typically lead to diseases or complications beyond vision problems. For some people, central serous retinopathy can lead to permanent central vision loss if the fluid underneath the macula does not resolve. Some treatments may also cause scarring, which can lead to impaired vision.
What causes central serous Chorioretinopathy?
Central serous chorioretinopathy is a disease that causes fluid to build up under the retina, the back part of the inner eye that sends sight information to the brain. The fluid leaks from the choroid (the blood vessel layer under the retina). The cause of this condition is unknown but stress can be a risk factor.
How long does CSR take to resolve?
Generally speaking, the way CSR may progress can be grouped into three categories. Most people will recover within 4-6 months without any need for treatment. CSR which lasts over 12 months. This is very rare but can lead to further changes such as RPE detachment or bullous retinal detachment.
How long does CSR take to heal?
Can CSR lead to macular degeneration?
Pigment changes indistinguishable from age-related macular degeneration frequently occurred in eyes with CSR. The difference in the development of such pigment changes between eyes with CSR (33 of 38) and nonaffected fellow eyes (12 of 35) was significant (P = . 001).